Processed seismic data and ERT inversion models used in the estimation of injected masses for the Ketzin CO2 pilot project for the years 2009 and 2012
Cite as:
Weinzierl, Wolfgang; Ganzer, Merlin; Rippe, Dennis; Lüth, Stefan; Schmidt-Hattenberger, Cornelia (2021): Processed seismic data and ERT inversion models used in the estimation of injected masses for the Ketzin CO2 pilot project for the years 2009 and 2012. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.8.2021.004
Status
I N R E V I E W : Weinzierl, Wolfgang; Ganzer, Merlin; Rippe, Dennis; Lüth, Stefan; Schmidt-Hattenberger, Cornelia (2021): Processed seismic data and ERT inversion models used in the estimation of injected masses for the Ketzin CO2 pilot project for the years 2009 and 2012. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.8.2021.004
Abstract
Seismic and geoelectric/electro-magnetic methods are used as complementary tools for the identification of fluid/gas effects in underground storage and production scenarios. Both methods generally have very different resolution. Seismic tends to be acquired by much more dense geometrical layouts and the geoelectric or electro-magnetic acquisition being a potential field method shows information integrated over spatial distances. These inherent scale and design dependent differences require spatial tuning in joint inversion approaches and careful matching in independent interpretations of both methods. We present results matching seismic and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) results from two repeat surveys acquired during CO2 storage operations at the Ketzin pilot site in Germany.
Datasets are provided in HDF5 format and grouped in different levels. Two main levels exist. Raw data includes processed seismic data and ERT inversion results. Seismic mass estimation relies on amplitude differences and timeshifts. ERT inversion results have been converted from VTK. Please read the data description file for more information.
Additional Information
The dataset was created within SECURe project (Subsurface Evaluation of CCS and Unconventional Risks) - https://www.securegeoenergy.eu/. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 764531.
Grant Ref ENER/H2020/764531/SECURe
Authors
Weinzierl, Wolfgang;GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Ganzer, Merlin;GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Rippe, Dennis;GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
Lüth, Stefan;GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
affiliation (affiliationIdentifier=0000-0003-2326-0975 affiliationIdentifierScheme=ORCID): GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
creator
creatorName (nameType=Personal): Ganzer, Merlin
givenName: Merlin
familyName: Ganzer
affiliation (affiliationIdentifier= affiliationIdentifierScheme=): GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
creator
creatorName (nameType=Personal): Rippe, Dennis
givenName: Dennis
familyName: Rippe
affiliation (affiliationIdentifier= affiliationIdentifierScheme=): GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
affiliation (affiliationIdentifier=0000-0001-9696-3298 affiliationIdentifierScheme=ORCID): GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
affiliation (affiliationIdentifier=0000-0002-3058-7469 affiliationIdentifierScheme=ORCID): GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
titles
title: Processed seismic data and ERT inversion models used in the estimation of injected masses for the Ketzin CO2 pilot project for the years 2009 and 2012
publisher: GFZ Data Services
publicationYear: 2021
subjects
subject: Resistivity
subject: Tomography
subject: Saturation
subject: Seismic data
subject: Ketzin
subject: SECURe
subject: Subsurface Evaluation of CCS and Unconventional Risks
CharacterString: Processed seismic data and ERT inversion models used in the estimation of injected masses for the Ketzin CO2 pilot project for the years 2009 and 2012
CharacterString: Seismic and geoelectric/electro-magnetic methods are used as complementary tools for the identification of fluid/gas effects in underground storage and production scenarios. Both methods generally have very different resolution. Seismic tends to be acquired by much more dense geometrical layouts and the geoelectric or electro-magnetic acquisition being a potential field method shows information integrated over spatial distances. These inherent scale and design dependent differences require spatial tuning in joint inversion approaches and careful matching in independent interpretations of both methods. We present results matching seismic and electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) results from two repeat surveys acquired during CO2 storage operations at the Ketzin pilot site in Germany.
Datasets are provided in HDF5 format and grouped in different levels. Two main levels exist. Raw data includes processed seismic data and ERT inversion results. Seismic mass estimation relies on amplitude differences and timeshifts. ERT inversion results have been converted from VTK. Please read the data description file for more information.
pointOfContact
CI_ResponsibleParty
individualName
CharacterString: Schmidt-Hattenberger, Cornelia
organisationName
CharacterString: GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
CI_OnLineFunctionCode (codeList=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/resources/Codelist/gmxCodelists.xml#CI_OnLineFunctionCode codeListValue=http://www.isotc211.org/2005/resources/Codelist/gmxCodelists.xml#CI_OnLineFunctionCode_information): information